July 26, 2019

Identifying Asteraceae by using keys

I have been learning various Asteraceae using popular guides, but always had the feeling that there should be some way to systematize this huge group of plants and somehow get beyond just learning a bunch of unrelated individuals.

I had hoped that learning tribes and subfamilies would help, but it really hasn't. Part of the problem is that the keys I have available are not set up in terms of tribes. The other is that whatever you do with these plants, you are going to have to start taking flowers (or inflorescences) apart and looking at little things with a hand lens, or better yet with a binocular microscope.

I am fortunate to have a binocular microscope at hand. This is a big improvement over a hand lens, not just for superior optics and lighting, but because you have both hands free to use tweezers or razor blades.

My approach to try to teach myself how to do this is to collect a number of plants I already know well and then key them out. This is working quite well.

Things you need

My favorite book to learn the plant lingo is the book "How to Identify Plants" by H.D. Harrington I am happy to report, this is still available for under $20.

Asteraceae specific terms

It may be wise to collect some older flowers, since the keys sometimes ask if petals are persistent when the flower dries or if they fall off. Also the keys inevitably ask about the receptacle, so you may as well start by plucking at least part of it bare to see what is going on with it.

Case studies

Artificial keys versus "Synoptical" keys

Some flora recognize some scheme for Asteraceae tribes and some do not. Those that do not (such as "Arizona Flora") offer an artificial key. Some of the major divisions may indeed correspond to tribal divisions, such as is the case for the Chicory tribe.

The "Manual of the Plants of Colorado" provides both sorts of key for the Asteraceae! That's the way to do things!

The California Jepson Manual uses an Artificial key, but a natural key has been published elsewhere (by Strother).

This article is referenced as "Strother 1997, Madrono 44 (1):1-28". Some searching gives the full title: "synoptical keys to genera of california composites". Apparently "Madrono" is a journal! Recent issues describe it is a "West American journal of Botany". Older issues call it the "Journal of the California Botanical Society".

Here is the article abstract:

Synoptical keys are sometimes preferred to artificial keys. In the synoptical keys provided here, the 207 genera of composites recognized in The Jepson Manual represent 2 of the 3 subfamilies and 13 of the 16 tribes used in a classification system differing only slightly from that proposed by Bremer in 1994. Of the 207 genera treated in The Jepson Manual, Heliantheae (incl. Helenieae), as circumscribed here, includes 78 (distributed among 17 subtribes) and Astereae and Lactuceae have 33 each. The other ten tribes are represented in The Jepson Manual by 1 to 14 genera each.
The U of A only has full text access for volume 52 and on. The journal in text is available at the herbarium library. It is interesting because it may be a link between the Asteraceae keys in the Jepson guide and the Asteraceae tribes.

Software driven keys

Interestingly, there are now computer driven keys that have certain advantages over the usual binary keys in printed media. In particular, the printed keys can get "stuck" if some attribute of the plant was not observed, whereas the software keys will at least give a set of candidates that match the criteria that have been given so far.

There are two flavors of these keys, MEKA (multiple entry key algorithm) and SLIKS. Actually SLIKS may simply be a public implementation of MEKA, but may require that the data be prepared in a certain way.


Have any comments? Questions? Drop me a line!

Tom's Plant pages / tom@mmto.org