Modifying Canon FD lenses for use on EOS cameras

This is the way to do things right. Thee are a number of people (discussed elsewhere) offering kits (for $120 to $140) to modify various FD lenses for use on EOS cameras. This page discusses some of the issues if you want to attempt it yourself.

Some people do this with hand tools, JB weld, and a dremel tool. There are things to learn from their process, but since I have access to a machine shop, this is not the approach I intend to take.

Machine shop work

The game is to remove the FD locking ring, and then in some way attach a flange with the proper EF mount bayonet lugs. Some means of controlling the aperture must also be considered. Some cases will require some lathe work, but since I am seeing kits offered to do the conversion, I am convinced that modifying parts of the original FD lens is not essential in many cases.

If you plan to put a modified lens on a full frame camera, you need to worry about the FD control levers protruding far enough back into the body that the mirror crashes into them when you take a photo, causing catastrophic camera damage. I have heard that lenses 28mm and shorter cause this sort of trouble.

Infinity focus fine adjustment

Most FD lenses (perhaps most lenses period) are designed to allow some fine adjustment of infinity focus in the first place. Typically there are setscrews holding a lens body within a focus helix which can be loosened and the lens body repositioned.

FD mount details

The FD mount was designed in 1971. The FD mount is a "breech mount" system. The main advantage is that the lens is not rotated against the camera when it is mounted, avoiding wear on critical surfaces. There are two "flavors" of the FD mount, the old and the new. The new system allows faster mounting of the lenses.

FD lens linkages

If you have ever looked at the back of an FD lens, you may have been puzzled by the various pins and levers:

One guys job on a FDn lens

The above link describes how this fellow modified a FDn mount 135mm f/2 lens. I may need to buy a lens spanner. He used epoxy to customize some internal parts, and JB weld to bond his thinned EF mount to the thinned piece that screwed to the lens.

I can't say for sure until I try it myself, but I would have been tempted to drill holes in the EF mount or his thinned piece so I could use screws to screw both to the lens. This way the thinned piece would just be a spacer or washer.

He also says that all the ball bearings that fell out of the lens did not need to be replaced. Someone elsewhere said that these were used because these lenses had to function with motor drives that would be working them at high speeds. Once they are customized for manual use they can probably be eliminated.

Also it seems that he has not provided a ring or lever to work the automatic lens mechanism, so this modification works with a totally manual diaphram.

Another effort on a 50/1.8 FD lens

He says that these sorts of lenses are very desirable for video work because the focus helix on manual lenss has a long taper. Lenses designed for autofocus have a short helix.

He does not show all the details and it is not clear if this is an old or new FD lens. He uses epoxy to customize the internal aperture linkage, joining a U-shaped part to the aperture ring. He also uses epoxy to join his flange to the lens. He uses a chipped M42 adapter for a mounting flange. He says he ground 1.0 to 1.5 mm off of the back end of the lens, but did not show or describe how he did the grinding. He then uses trial and error and shims to achieve infinity focus. His modification yields a totally manual diaphram. He says to take care about the "clocking" of the lens when you mount the flange since you are free to choose any angular position.

Great video: Jeff Johnson converting a 50 f/1.8 lens (old FD)

He does things right, using a lathe and doing quality work. He says that there are many variants of the 50 f/1.8 and he got lucky picking one that would be easy. He does not show all the details, but what he does show is very instructive. It is not clear what EF mounting flange he is using, or what the details of the aperture control adapter are. This is an exercise left for the reader.

Feedback? Questions? Drop me a line!

Tom's Digital Photography Info / tom@mmto.org