Big specimens are fine and wonderful, but I have chosen to simply collect micromounts.
This is not universally true, but I have noticed that many serious collectors of micro minerals become respectable mineralogists in ways that collectors of larger pieces seldom do. Conversely, many serious collectors of larger minerals end up acquiring a microscope (Dick Bideaux owned one), even if they do not become micromounters.
Many parts of the country have a seminar or symposium one a year. Tucson has a one day event on Friday during the Tucson main show. There is one in southern california in January, just a week or two before the Tucson show (those of us who live nearby, prefer it two weeks before, so we can rest up for Tucson, those who live farther away, would prefer to have them close together, so they can travel and hit both events). The Northern California group has an excellent event in the summer (3 days), and the Baltimore group has another 3 day event (and may be the group that originated the concept). The Tucson event is the only one day seminar, and people complain that there isn't enough time for talking and swapping, with most of the time given to lectures.
The micromounting world has a hall of fame. I have had the chance to meet several of these people, and I can simply say that it is worth it to make their acquaintance. This is their passion, and if you show a real interest, they will be eager to help and share, and they have a lot to offer. As much as anything, they were elected to the hall of fame because of their helful and generous attitude.
Buying micro material is a very nice contrast to other parts of the mineral world where big money changes hands and things are getting increasingly insane. The flip side to this is that low prices do not encourage dealers to handle micro material. Be willing to pay a decent price for what you get and make it worth a dealers while to do business and spend time with you. Also realize that some dealers love minerals and will be delighted to find someone interested in unusual species. (Hmm, I see a pattern here: micromounts and rare minerals.)
Neal Yedlin wrote the original micromounting column in the
Mineralogical Record Magazine. He said that a micromount is a
mineral specimen requiring magnification for proper appreciation,
permanently mounted and labelled. I have noticed that some people
who are enthused about micro minerals are reluctant or even strongly
opposed to permanent mounting. I am a little baffled by this, perhaps
because I understand the ravages of time. Mounting and labelling will
preserve these little treasures, first of all for the mounter to enjoy
in months and years to come (just a few years accumulation of dust,
or a few years lapse of memory can cause real and tragic loss).
To mount is to preserve!
It recently seems to have become "in vogue" to not make permanent mounts, but instead to simply perch specimens on a dab of "mineral tack" in some kind of box. These can hardly be called permanent mounts and would thus fall short of Yedlins definition of a micromount. This kind of thing may have its place for temporary storage (but the tack can leave a mess and hinder the ultimate preparation of a permanent mount). This should just be called what it is: lazy! and is not to be emulated. Good micros are too fragile, too ephemeral, and deserve to be preserved. That is what permanent labelling and mounting is all about.
You don't want a single tube biological microscope intended for use with transmitted light, but rather a stereo microscope (with two eyepieces). You want the kind of thing suited for looking at insects and flowers (and minerals!). The most useful magnification is the low powers (10 or 15), with the option to switch to higher power as needed. The scope I use the most is a zoom scope offering a range of powers from 10 to 30. Higher powers are handy on occasion, but require a really good light (and quality optics) to be useful.
A good illuminator is crucial and makes a huge difference. You can (and some people do, and rightly so) spend nearly as much on a good illuminator as you can on a microscope.
I like LED illuminators a lot. I am somewhat of a do it yourself person, and have been able to arrange an entirely suitable LED illuminator for a few dollars. It has two great advantages. One is that it is small and easily portable, the other is that it easily runs from batteries. I also have a large heavy and very bright fiber optic light source that is really helpful when using higher magnification.
Many people dislike LED illuminators, the usual objection being that they are "so blue". My rejoinder is that said people are just used to incandenscent tungsten filament illumination, which is "so yellow". In short, you can get used to either, but a sudden change to what you are not used to will definitely get your attention.
Buy and use a good mineral book!Here are a couple of good books to get started with:
The Complete Guide to Micromounts by Milton L. Speckels, 1965, Gembooks, 97 pages. --- This is the little pink book that got everything started (so to speak), now out of print, but you may get lucky and find a used copy.
The Complete Book of Micromounting by Quintin Wight, 1993, First Edition, Mineralogical Record Press, 283 pages --- This book was begun by Neal Yedlin (1908-1977), continued by Paul Desautels (1920-1991) and finished by Quintin Wight. It is by far the best and most up to date thing available in English, although books on micromounting are said to be available in German, French, and Italian.
Supplies
Uncle Tom's Mineralogy Info / tom@mmto.org