vocl> odisp ( date=190520, info="ttmp",asp="b",frame=3 ) ERROR: segmentation violationA variety of experiments were performed. Using "display dev$pix" demonstrates that ximtool is working just fine. Running "cl < hello.cl" with the following one line script yields no problems.
[tom@trona Casting]$ cat hello.cl print "Hello Oven"I would like to get a core dump and browse it a bit with gdb and see if that yields some clues, but that is not as easy as it sounds.
It turns out, for some unexplainable reason, on systems running systemd (why should that matter?) the core dumps go to /var/lib/systemd/coredump. This was verified by writing and running the following short C program (fail.c):
main() { char *p = (char *) 0; int val; val = *p; }Compiling and running this on my Fedora 30 system yields:
ls /var/lib/systemd/coredump core.fail.1004.627907121ac942628ff05686de6393a4.9681.1560717343000000.lz4This compressed thing can be decompressed using unlz4 (or lz4 -d)
Then run "gdb fail core"
bt - gives a backtrace disass 0x40116 - disassembles at address disas STARTADDRESS ENDADDRESS
ulimit -c unlimitedSupposedly this will be inherited by child processes. For the case in question, I run a terminal with bash, and give it the "ulimit -c unlimited command", then I start the cl, then I type "odisp ( date=190520, info="ttmp",asp="b",frame=3 )" and get the segment violation message. But no core dump appears.
coredumpctl No coredumps found.On this same system (the one yielding the seg fault running odisp) I compile and run the fail.c program:
./fail Segmentation fault (core dumped) [tom@linuxpilot Fail]$ coredumpctl TIME PID UID GID SIG COREFILE EXE Sun 2019-06-16 13:58:56 MST 26008 1002 1002 11 present /u1/tom/Fail/fail [tom@linuxpilot Fail]$ [tom@linuxpilot Fail]$ ls /var/lib/systemd/coredump core.fail.1002.7c67ecda536347a690b162a87c6736ff.26008.1560718736000000.lz4So, this system is doing what it should be regarding core dumps, but the IRAF cl must be catching signals or doing something obnoxious and brain-damaged to prevent it. The only way to push further on this problem is to figure out how to run processes without the cl getting involved.
Tom's home page / tom@mmto.org