Linux photo viewers and browsers

Introduction

I should let you know up front what I do and don't want from an image viewer.

Adobe Bridge

OK, I'll admit it. I run windows for the single sole purpose of running photoshop. As a serious photographer, I decided that the expense of a second computer and photoshop itself was money well spent. Photoshop might be the most impressive piece of application software I have ever used, bar none. Adobe bridge is the standard that all of the image viewer software packages should strive to emulate.

gthumb

The viewer I have the most experience with is gthumb. It does most of what I want quite well. It's biggest liability is that new releases can be quite flakey. Many times an official release is buggy and frustrating and I find myself longing for the version I ran just a month ago. At one time I got so frustrated that I decided to get my hands on the source code and see if I could do something about the mess:

Back in 2010 there were a bunch of issues with the "clutter" library and instability (segfaulting and core dumps) that were alegedly related to 3D effects. Apparently someone had ideas about doing "cool things" in slide show mode. All well and good, but unstable code like this should be thoroughly testing in a development branch, and besides that, who needs this nonsense.

f-spot

This is often recommended, but from what I have read, it is eager to import your images and put them into its organizational scheme. Not what I want.

shotwell

See: A quick grumpy review of shotwell.

Like f-spot, shotwell seems to want to import your images and organize them for you.

darktable

See Darktable.org

It looks good, but what scares me is that it says it wants to "manage my digital negatives in a database". No, No!!

geeqie

I tried this when gthumb was having one of its fits, and thought it was pretty nice.

ristretto

Also nice, clean, and simple. And it works!
Have any comments? Questions? Drop me a line!

Adventures in Computing / tom@mmto.org